Mohammad Taghi Rafiei; Abolfazl Shahin
Abstract
< p >< p >Resolving the conflict of laws applicable to cultural heritage disputes in an important challenge which is faced with private international law. The cause of this challenge is, in one hand, the preponderant role of cultural property in constituting of cultural and historical identity ...
Read More
< p >< p >Resolving the conflict of laws applicable to cultural heritage disputes in an important challenge which is faced with private international law. The cause of this challenge is, in one hand, the preponderant role of cultural property in constituting of cultural and historical identity of nations, and the enormous profit of illicit trade of cultural properties on the other hand which leads to numerous disputes. In most of these claims, the lex rei sitae rule has been applied and this has been led to making unfair judgments. The negative effects of these decisions lead to the question of determining the proper law governing cultural property claims. The theory of applying the lex originis rule to cultural property disputes is the theory which is accepted in this article. In order to prove this theory, this article is divided into two parts by a descriptive and analytical method: at first, the lex rei situs rule will be studied and the applying of this rule to cultural property claims will be examined by a critical perspective and then the alternative courses of action will be analyzed.
Jafar Nouri Youshanlooi; Abolfazl Shahin
Abstract
The reform of the French contract law occurred pursuant to the Ordinance No. 2016-131 of February 10, 2016 implements the reform of legal regime governing contractual obligations and evidence. For the purpose of simplification of French contract law and in the light of its compatibility with laws on ...
Read More
The reform of the French contract law occurred pursuant to the Ordinance No. 2016-131 of February 10, 2016 implements the reform of legal regime governing contractual obligations and evidence. For the purpose of simplification of French contract law and in the light of its compatibility with laws on international contracts, this Ordinance makes major changes to French contract law such as reinforcing the role of judges for securing contractual justice and increasing the power of unilateral consent for the purpose of economic efficiency of contract. French contract law has a great influence on Iranian contract law and Iranian jurists in the context of the contracts. Commentaries on Iranian Civil Code have paid a great attention to French law, which led to a close relationship between French contract law and its Iranian counterpart. Therefore, this article aims to explore the effects of new French contract law on Iranian law
